this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
19 points (85.2% liked)

Technology

78154 readers
1439 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 25 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Redeeming a gift card should never, ever lead to an account ban. Even if this card wasn't bought in a legitimate chain, but on the sketchiest website ever. It's in the nature of a gift card that the one who redeems it, is not always the one who bought it.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

The system rejecting the card is one thing, and perfectly valid. This is like the technological equivalent of an anaphylactic reaction.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

in the scamming world, its never the same person, like whoever implemented that policy was smoking something good.

In the fraudster world you either sell the codes that you ripped off a card, or you have another person buy the card to give it to you. It's never the same person, the fact they are banning based off suspicious activity screams big head who doesn't understand the impact or reason for their changes outside "defrauded cards bad"