this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
465 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

77847 readers
3818 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Windows 98 felt as if it was very sensible (when it didn't hang). Windows 2000 Server I still remember as the best one. XP was too bright in visual design, but homely.

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The only two incarnations of Windows I found to be acceptable were NT4 and W2k. Anything later was mostly a step into the wrong direction.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 12 hours ago

Using XP was almost the same as using W2K, except uglier, but more sci-fi-feeling. IIRC.

But yes, I too remember W2K as the best one.

From the PoV of a kid visiting websites, reading books on the Web, playing forum RPGs and some video games, and downloading MP3s. And talking over ICQ.

From that PoV it was fast, clean and without distractions and I liked the icons, the sounds and the wallpapers.