this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
445 points (84.7% liked)
Memes
53541 readers
723 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't normally consider people that use anti-communist pejoratives like "tankie" to be genuine in their leftism. Especially those that try to pretend works of fiction are genuine evidence against socialism.
Lol, you're confirming the meme.
When someone claims to be a leftist but starts attacking socialism with literal works of fiction, and calls those that point that out anti-communist pejoratives like "tankie," I doubt their sincerity. The meme is true in this instance, in the sense that I as a communist don't really see what's "left" about anti-communism.
I started by saying that not all victims of communism were Nazis.
Lying sack of shit
Nobody ever said that they‘re all Nazis, not even the meme.
Also, you started by citing fiction to make a point using whataboutism.
You are not a sincere person.
Akshually...
Idk if you're genuinely illiterate or what but the comment you've posted here does not say "all" anywhere
You literally implied in that thread that all victims of Stalin's repression were nazis. Now you are backpedalling.
So that's a yes to the illiteracy lol, not surprising
You literally assumed that implication. And in any case, no one would seriously claim that every single person who the Red Army killed was a Nazi. That would have been literally impossible given that it was the bloodiest war in world history.
Deeply unserious pedantry.
Actually what? You stalked another user on another meme post about another topic to make no point at all. Are you a bit dim?
@Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml - what's your defense?
Stalin killed a shitload of nazis, no defense is necessary I'm 100% right
OPs meme conceals all the suffering of the other victims.
There are also victims of Jews.
When OP criticizes "Mein Kampf" for it's ridiculously demonizing claims against this group of people by saying that these "Victims of Jews" mentioned in the book were warmongering imperialists, then it doesn't mean that OP is concealing true victims made by Jews.
Sure, by giving a work of fiction as evidence, and calling us "tankies" for providing evidence of that fact along with actual historical texts like Russian Justice. When you wilfully replicate Red Scare propaganda even in the face of evidence to the contrary, you are doing the work of anti-communists, hence why any personal feelings you may have towards leftism are secondary to your willful participation in demonizing socialism.
What sources are there that the book is fictional, other than his ex-wife?
Alexander Solzhenitsyn was an anti-semitic Nazi sympathizer, and was arrested as such. His fiction is based on the folklore of the gulag system, and archival evidence and historical texts paint a much clearer picture of the soviet prison system. He's essentially Yeonmi Park but for the USSR.
Here's a real quote:
>The German army could have liberated the Soviet Union from Communism but Hit1er was stupid and did not use this weapon.
From an excellent thread going over his many ideological failings:
I asked for sources that the Gulag book is fiction.
His ex-wife outright called it fictional, he was a known liar and conspiracy theorist, and archival evidence of the soviet prison system contradicts his personal accounts. Do you agree with him about his anti-semitic conspiracy theories, or do you think that he's a selectively honest person with a reliable account of socialism, but completely opposite adherance to the truth otherwise? I'm not sure how much more evidence you need beyond knowing that one anti-semitic Nazi-sympathizer's personal account, whose own wife at the time of writing claimed is fictional, is more trustworthy than historical evidence.
Again, is there any source other than his ex-wife? I didn't deal with his opinion of Jews.
Again, his claims contradict archival evidence, he is a known liar, and has benefited massively from spinning these tall tales, on top of his wife at the time of writing explaining that it's fiction. Are you looking for personal admission of guilt? You won't find it, just like you won't find it from Yeonmi Park. Instead, you find evidence that contradicts his personal account, of which he only supports with his personal, unreliable testemony.
Why exactly do you trust the word alone of an anti-semitic Nazi sympathizer?