this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
815 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

77925 readers
4431 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
815
AI-generated code contains more bugs and errors than human output (www.techradar.com)
submitted 1 day ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
200 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bad@jlai.lu 22 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Although I don't doubt the results… can we have a source for all the numbers presented in this article?

It feels AI generated itself, there's just a mishmash of data with no link to where that data comes from.

There has to be a source, since the author mentions:

So although the study does highlight some of AI's flaws [...] new data from CodeRabbit has claimed

CodeRabbit is an AI code reviewing business. I have zero trust in anything they say on this topic.

Then we get to see who the author is:

Craig’s specific interests lie in technology that is designed to better our lives, including AI and ML, productivity aids, and smart fitness. He is also passionate about cars

Has anyone actually bothered clicking the link and reading past the headline?

Can you please not share / upvote / get ragebaited by dogshit content like this?

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

People, especially on lemmy are looking for any cope that Ai will just fall apart by itself and no longer bother them by existing, so they'll upvote whatever lets them think that.

The reality that we are just heading towards the trough of disappear wherethe investor hype peters off and then we eventually just have a legitimately useful technology with all the same business hurdles of any other technology (tech bros trying to control other peoples lives to enrich themselves or harm people they don't like)