this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
815 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

77925 readers
4431 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] termaxima@slrpnk.net 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

ChatGPT is great at generating a one line example use of a function. I would never trust its output any further than that.

[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

So much this. People who say ai can’t write code are just using it wrong. You need to break things down to bite size problems and just let it autocomplete a few lines at a time. Increase your productivity like 200%. And don’t get me started about not having to search through a bunch of garbage google results to find the documentation I’m actually looking for.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 2 points 4 hours ago

It’s laughable to me that people haven’t figured this out.

[–] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

How? "Hey, ChatGPT, write the thirty-second line of this function?"

[–] toddestan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I don't know about ChatGPT, but Github Copilot can act like an autocomplete. Or you can think of it as a fancier Intellisense. You still have to watch its output as it can make mistakes or hallucinate library function calls and things like that, but it can also be quite good at anticipating what I was going to write and saves me some keystrokes. I've also found I can prompt it in a way by writing a comment and it'll follow up with attempt to fill in code based upon that comment. I've certainly found it to be a net time saver.

[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Well not quite - I use ChatGPT more like to brainstorm ideas and sometimes I’ll paste a whole file or two into the prompt and ask what’s wrong and tell it the issue I’m seeing, it usually gives me the correct answer right away or after clarifying once or twice.

I use copilot for tab completion. Sometimes it finishes a line or two sometimes more. Usually it’s good code if it’s able to read your existing codebase as a reference. bonus points for using an MCP.

Warp terminal for intensive workflows. It’s integrated into your machine and can do whatever like implementing CICD scripts, executing commands, ssh into remote servers set up your infrastructure etc… I’ll use this when I really need the ai to understand my code base as a whole before providing any code or executing commands.