this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2025
178 points (100.0% liked)

World News

51558 readers
1845 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 84 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (24 children)

This has been known for years (decades?): setting black text against a black background in a PDF doesn't eliminate the text in the PDF. Duh...

The only reason why this is still an idiotic mistake made by public officials is because public officials are idiots.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 1 week ago (22 children)

The more I read about what's in some of these files (e.g. a report about Trump being present while a 13yo rape victim's newborn baby was thrown into lake Michigan), the more I'm starting to think it was intentional.

The people who had to go through this shit to redact it might be fascist pieces of shit, but they're still ostensibly in fields at least somewhat related to law enforcement. Having to read shit like that, and then be complicit in covering it up... I dunno.

[–] Paragone@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You may never have heard of the AAAA, the Advertisers Against Advertising Alliance..


Imagine a cigarette-company wants some advertising-work done..

Imagine that you're dead set against cigarette-companies, but they don't know that..

Imagine getting the contract, & doing advertising-design for them, where they get an advertising-campaign which to them looks good, but .. doesn't work on people..

Imagine that that is exactly what you had intended..

No card-carrying, no meetings, no visible-connections: only independent people contributing independently.

( I suspect that the drugstore "Life" brand, at Shopper's Drug Mart was done by a member of the AAAA: NOBODY with health-sense would buy that shit, as a result of the campaign they had, years ago, when I lived in a city )


Now remap it from AAAA to someone ordered to redact evil, to protect the regime against accountability..

Imagine you know exactly that this highlighting-with-black won't work..

Imagine that this is exactly why you use the method: to protect accountability, in a dying-empire's deathspasms..

It then becomes possible to "do one's job" & be complicit within the regime ( but notice those falsifying-quotes! ),

while one protects integrity, Justice, & accountability, by doing one's "job" in a way which enables actual-Journalism, should there be any left, to dig-in..


Beauty, eh?

_ /\ _

[–] Karkitoo@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

Sooo, malicious compliance?

My favorite

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)