this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
88 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

78029 readers
4783 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you want to fight for something, please learn what you stand behind.

And how do you know I haven't? Do you have insight into my mind?

Here's my stance: Fuck Google. When have they ever done anything for the benefit of humanity? If this turns out to do exactly what it says on the tin, I'll be happy to eat my words, but pardon me if I don't believe that Google is suddenly interested in clean energy.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

And lets take a step back to see the forest for the trees and realize the destination for this energy is more AI slop with little to no use for anyone.

It's like celebrating some company deciding to use EV bulldozers to demolish the Amazon rainforest.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 21 hours ago

Exactly. It would have been better for them to put their money towards not generating CO2 in the first place. Batteries are nothing special, and they're signing off on this project so they can appear green, because it uses CO2.