this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
914 points (98.9% liked)

World News

51798 readers
3102 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump said that Venezuela’s new leader, Delcy Rodríguez, would help the United States run Venezuela. She quickly said the opposite.

Trump said Delcy Rodríguez was sworn in as Venezuela’s interim president and would act as a partner in letting the United States run the country.

“She’s essentially willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again,” he said.

Less than two hours later, Ms. Rodríguez — who was Nicolás Maduro’s vice president — delivered a televised address to Venezuela that made clear she viewed the United States as an illegal invader that must be rejected.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 131 points 5 days ago (7 children)

On the one hand, Maduro's leadership is illegitimate and horrible.

That said, the US isn't invading because they want to bring peace and democracy to them. It's because they want to get oil production for private businesses back into the country and because they didn't "fall in line".

Fucking US Imperialism revival going on......

[–] amorangi@lemmy.nz 90 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Say you're living in a house with a shitty landlord. The local mobster turns up at his house, beats him up, and steals the keys to his tenants' houses. The tenants cheer! The mobster then proceeds to turn up at your house, open the doors with the keys, and steals all your shit.

The mobster is not on your side and never was.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 48 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Note that "all your shit" includes your copper plumbing and wiring so your house is uninhabitable. He probably tracked in a bunch of PFAS and other toxic stuff all over your garden too. And left an upper decker in your toilet for good measure.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

And then his friends companies will offer to replace your copper pipes with some shit that’s illegal in their home town

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 4 points 5 days ago

ah the 'ol upper decker!
hit em where it hurts (and where they can't see it, only smell it. well except for the toilet that keeps flushing brown)

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Agreed. But, going forward. Don't even give the first "hand" point. It's meaningless. All it does is give a "both sides" opening for the normies to think there is debate.

This isn't 2010. The fascist don't arguing in good faith. Just state that this shit is wrong, why it's wrong, and move on.

We ARE the Nazis. There isn't a "well, you would invade if Hilter was leader" argument to be had. This is the equivalent of Hilter invading Venezuela. There are no scenarios in which "one hand" needs to be said.

I really hope people start to understand this. Because, at this point, any "hand" given to America is like giving justification for Nazi Germany.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 5 points 5 days ago

In this case rhe US are the baddies however you spin it

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

I'd argue it's closer to Russia invading Cuba, but valid.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world -4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No. Forgetting truth is what got us here. Maduro was a sham-"elected" dictator, not some gardener making tomatoes.

Words mean things, and using them dishonestly weakens the word. We are not Nazis, Trump is not Hitler, as there are not literal roving death squads literally rounding up and gunning down minorities as state policy. The US is not invading Venezuela for liebenstraum with the intent of genociding the people who live there.

The words you're looking for are "Mussolini" and "fascist Italy". Can even mention invading Ethiopia! And maybe even relish in how Mussolini met his end :)

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

Venezuela's elections were widely monitored, even independent groups from the US said they didn't find irregularities. The people saying it was stolen are the same people asking Trump to take over, and they also support Israeli genocide and asked them to help as well. Do you have a direct source for your conviction that the elections were a sham?

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Maduro's leadership is a helluva lot more legitimate than the orange pedophile.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 7 points 5 days ago

The bar of course, is so low we still haven't heard it hit the bottom yet. :(

[–] MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It’s unclear that they’re illegitimate.

Yes, they certainly manipulated an election.

…but “the west” was manipulating the same election.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not sure what you mean.

I’m saying it not at all clear Maduro is illegitimate. Trump certainly has no high ground to unilaterally decide who is and who isn’t.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

"revival" you say, as if this hasn't been the entire history of the US. they're just not bothering to even try to cover it up anymore

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yes. If they intervened right after the elections, there could be an argument, but now it’s obvious that it’s only about business. Trump and his cronies don’t give a shit about democracy

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 4 days ago

i heard chevron was still operating under maduro, but the others ones were ousted decades ago.