this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
204 points (98.1% liked)
Technology
78511 readers
4095 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There is not. The Dyson Sphere is (now) a sci-fi concept that was never based in reality. This is from the guy who wrote it. It was a joke paper because he thought that SETI was a waste of time, just like that paper he wrote. Look up the paper, it literally won't take more than 15 minutes to read, it's like 1 page long and there is NO math or science in it. TLDR: We'd have to disassemble a planet the size of Jupiter to get enough "raw" matter to build one. It says nothing about how that matter would be converted into usable materials.
Then for a billionaire to pretend to be a physicist just because he's got money, who won't even bother reading the source papers, shows their sheer stupidity to even utter the phrase "maybe we could build a Dyson Sphere in our lifetime".
yeah i mixed it up with an O'Neill cylinder.
To be fair its absoloutely something you could build in reality within the realms of current science but nowhere near within current logistics or technology we actually have yet. Plus it would take a couple of thousand years and be more of satelite swarm than a solid shell.