this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
39 points (91.5% liked)
Selfhosted
60210 readers
1035 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil.
-
No spam.
-
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
-
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
the reason i pumped the brakes, was an issue filed yesterday by a brand new user and closed by the owner. asking why it was sending a bunch of network requests somewhere random. then it was edited for content and the name of the issue was changed by the owner and closed.
my spidey sense pricked up? but I'm just an old stoned n00b so i wanted to hear what the old stoned wizards thought
Ohh that’s suspicious. I’m going to kill mine for now and take a look later tonight. I’ll report back if I find anything interesting!
Ok, so I ran the repo through an LLM to look for any suspicious requests, and it came back clean.
But it’s hella suspicious that the repo owner edited away the issue and closed it without a response.
It’s also hella suspicious that the user that reported that issue created their account yesterday.
I think I need to go the nuclear option: pop a gummy and monitor the network traffic of the container and see what it’s doing.
o7 godspeed! i appreciate you your effort. the spirit of this project does sound so cool so i was a little heartbroken.
enjoy the edible!
Well that was fun! I'm confident this project isn't malicious. It's for sure coded using AI, and I think that's what triggered a smear campaign. This removed Reddit post looks like there is just a downvote brigade out to get the project because the author admitted to using AI.
The only network traffic it's made when I monitored it was local. Certainly nothing went to Asia.
I think it tries to solve a neat problem. There's so many features packed in that it's obviously vibe coded. That's probably a huge turn off for AI detractors. If you don't care about that, I think you're safe to give it a try.
Issue in question: https://github.com/aquantumofdonuts/mixarr/issues/7
Welp, that issue has "officially" been deleted, as well as a followup issue asked by another person asking about that first issue feeling fishy.
While a full ‘deletion’ of such an issue is certainly unfortunate, I can kind of see how it gets to such a decision point.
You’re creating some software in the open, decide to ping some communities on reddit/lemmy and all of a sudden it seems like a disgruntled brigade is breaking down your door while you just wanted to show them the garden.
What for us looks like earnest sleuthing can feel like abuse/harassment from the other side simply due to the asymmetrical nature of the internet.
Would have probably still preferred a closed issue instead, but having a couple ‘niche-successful’ repos on github myself - I can at least certainly empathise.
understood! i will keep my eyes on this repo!