this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
856 points (99.1% liked)
Leopards Ate My Face
8557 readers
1324 users here now
Rules:
- The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
- Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
- If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
- Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
- For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
- Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
- This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
- All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.
Also feel free to check out:
Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
American voters love Democratic, even progressive policies, but hate Democratic (and especially progressive) candidates. It's baffled me for three decades. The only thing I really come up with is that the absolutist, paternalistic, simplistic persona typical of Republican candidates encodes 'leadership' vastly more than the inclusive, empathetic persona of Democrats. As a population, we are bad at identifying leadership.
https://www.ted.com/talks/martin_gutmann_are_we_celebrating_the_wrong_leaders
I think you have pinpointed the core issue.
Right-wing republican policies and ideas lends themselves to simple (but often wrong) models of explanation; "it is the fault of the immigrants; the poor; abortion is always immoral", etc. You get candidates that radiate confident leadership spewing simple talking points they believe in.
Left-wing, especially progressive, ideas are often rooted in insight into the incomplete understanding we have of the underlying complexities. People who navigate these ideas won't be as confident: "the cause is a bit of this and a bit of that; we don't really know, but research points at" etc. To confidently sell policies based on these ideas to voters requires a level of cognitive dissonance, and also opens for criticism on being indecisive.
How can we package left-wing ideas in a way that attracts voters who are swayed by simple ideas presented with absolut confidence?
They’re either racist, hold some other form of prejudice or they’re hypocrites.
They’re bad people. I’m sorry if they’re close to you but they’re bad people.
I get it, I have a relative like this. Their flaw is racism and prejudice toward LGBT+, so they support and vote for awful politicians.
Yeah and I think I fall for this somewhat too. Here in Massachusetts we tend to be fairly progressive but tend to elect Republicans governors, because they’re more “leadership”.
Even among presidents, I didn’t hate Reagan as much because at least he was “presidential”, not embarrassing as the public face of the country, but then we had ever shrinking republicans that just looked childish and less professional each time. But democrats just don’t have any presence until Obama and biden
seems like the case with NYC, bipolar democrats while they prefer republicans at the state or city levels, because rich people wanted it that way. i live in the west coast, "blue here, but people here profess alot of conservative values, not neccesarily magata values, but conservative none the less". its prominent because alot of people are transplants from other states.