this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
1114 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

78705 readers
3449 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Have you thought about not trying to drag meshtastic down to try and prop ham up?

I get it, you spent a bunch of time studying for your ham and you don't want it to feel like a waste, but lets be perfectly frank here- most people aren't going to get a HAM license. It IS, however, VERY accessible for someone to buy a cheap gadget on sale to try out.

I never understand why ham radio people always try to sabotage every other communication method, but you guys do it every time.

Let other people communicate how they want.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not trying to drag anything down. But I think it is important for many people to realize that the meshtastic is ultimately a ham device. It is using specific parts of the spectrum and reduced power to avoid needing the license. There's nothing wrong with that, but by definition, it isn't really adding anything that can't also be done on ham. In a similar vein, the only direction to go in terms of enhancing its capabilities is further into ham.

And no, I didn't spend a bunch of time doing anything. People vastly overestimate the complexity of the ham radio exams.

But by all means, use what you want to communicate. I'm not trying to dissuade anyone from it -- I just think it's important that they know the limitations of the device compared to the greater whole in which it exists.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

it isn’t really adding anything that can’t also be done on ham.

Encryption, affordability, ease of access.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is a misconception that you cannot do encryption with ham radio.

Affordability -- looks like a wash to me.

Ease of access -- maybe. But it generally does less, so it's a tradeoff.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

It is a misconception that you cannot do encryption with ham radio.

Encryption: read the comments - in some jurisdictions you can't (legally).
Affordability: in some parts of the work it's expensive to get a ham license (required by law).
Ease of access: that one's subjective, fine.