this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
36 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

60210 readers
951 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am looking at updating my email stack after a number of years and am wondering what to do for anti-spam. Is Spamassassin still the best option, or is there something better nowadays?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 2 points 5 months ago

I'm not really confident in this answer but, "not that I'm aware of".

I use mxroute as a paid / hosted IMAP & SMTP server. They run spam assassin, but it's obviously not trained on my own reports.

I've grown fond of Thunderbird as an email client. It's spam management is clunky but if you spend 15 minutes or so learning how it works, and then train it with both junk and not junk, it works reasonably well.

Sadly, it does occasionally throw a false positive, like maybe twice in the last year it identified a legit email as spam.

So, while I'm running a spam assassin and thunderbird combo, it's really TB that's doing the work because SA is really just filtering the super low hanging fruit.

TB is doing a very respectable job, but needs to be trained.