Selfhosted
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
-
No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
view the rest of the comments
You actually WANT to be with low free memory. Provided that most of it is used by cache.
Free memory is a waste, when you could cache stuff for faster access.
That's how Linux memory management works, and it make sense if you relflect on it. Better cache that page or that file that is used often, since free memory is just wasted. Cache can be freed and memory reclaimed in a fraction of a millisecond when needed.
So don't bother too much. Unless your SWAP usage is high, don't bother.
Also consider that Linux kernel will use your swap a bit even if you have lots of cache, because the kernel knows better than you how to improve your performances. Swapping out never used stuff is better than killing cached items.
Again, don't oberthink memory on Linux, the best alarm is when swap is constantly happening, then yes you need more ram (or to kill that broken process that keeps hogging due to a bug)
This is why I'd like to know what tool shows the most useful number. If I only have 4GB out of 30GB left, is that 26GB difference mostly important processes or mostly closable cache? Like, is htop borked and not showing me useful info or is it saying 8GB of the 26GB used is important showstopping stuff?
The most useful is probably
cat /proc/meminfo. The first couple of lines tell you everything you need to know.MemTotalis the total useful memory.MemFreeis how much memory is not used by anything.Cachedis memory used by various caches, ~~e.g. ZFS~~. This memory can be reallocated.MemAvailableis how much memory can be allocated, i.e.MemFree + Cached.You're an angel. ~~I don't know what the fuck htop is doing showing 8GB in use~~ ~~Based on another user comment in this thread, htop is showing a misleading number~~. For anyone else who comes across this, this is what I have. ~~This makes the situation seem a little more grim.~~ I have ~2GB free, ~28GB in use ~~, and of that ~28GB only ~3GB is cache that can be closed~~. For reference, I'm using ZFS and roughly 27 docker containers. ~~It doesn't seem like there is much room for future services to selfhost.~~
Most of those containers are probably grabbing more memory than they actually need. Consider applying some resource constraints to some of them.
Dozzle is an excellent addition to your docker setup, giving you live performance graphs for all your containers. It can help a lot with fine tuning your setup.
It took a bit of trial and error with Portainer, but under Runtime & Resources, you can adjust the amount of needed resources:
You should also look at which processes use the largest amount of memory. ZFS is weird and might allocate its cache memory as "used" instead of "cached". See here to set its limits: https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/limit-zfs-memory.140803/
Assuming the info in this link is correct, ZFS is using ~20GB for caching which makes htop's ~8GB of in use memory make sense when compared with the results from
cat /proc/meminfo. This is great news.My results after running
cat /proc/spl/kstat/zfs/arcstats: