Selfhosted
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil.
-
No spam.
-
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
-
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.
-
AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
view the rest of the comments
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30869297/difference-between-memfree-and-memavailable
Looking at the htop source:
https://github.com/htop-dev/htop/blob/main/MemoryMeter.c
It's adding used, shared, and compressed memory, to get the amount actually tied up, but disregarding cached memory, which, based on the above comment, is problematic, since some of that may not actually be available for use.
top, on the other hand, is using the kernel's MemAvailable directly.https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/-/blob/master/src/free.c
In short: You probably want to trust /proc/meminfo's MemAvailable, (which is what
topwill show), andhtopis probably giving a misleadingly-low number.Thank you for the detailed explanation
No problem. It was an interesting question that made me curious too.
Came across some more info that you might find interesting. If true, htop is ignoring the cache used by ZFS but accounting for everything else.
link
Yes, ZFS cache has been contentious for exactly the reason you posted, but it is generally not a functional issue.
ZFS will release cache under memory pressure, however nice values of virtualizing can potentially demand it sooner than ZFS can release it.
There have been many changes to ZFS to improve this, but the legacy of "invisible cache" is still around.