this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
1420 points (99.5% liked)
Technology
79476 readers
4038 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's such a nonsensical take. Because you don't trust the US government, you're go to thought is to hand over your data to an opaque authoritarian regime like the CCP? What kind of a bullshit false dichotomy is that? Fuck that, my data is my data. It doesn't belong to any government, corporation, or anybody who isn't me or someone that I explicitly give consent to use my data. That's the principled take.
No, I am just explaining to you why people have used it. Humans do human things.. being upset at it wont change the why. Citizens are terrified of the current threat. Not one miles away. Humans are wired to react to immediate danger.
I still disagree with that notion. That's not normal human behavior. You're making it sound as if people can only process the top immediate threat and disregard the rest. But that's not humans work. Humans are able to have and process multiple threats at once. If what you're saying is true then nobody would care about what's going on in Ukraine, Iran, or Gaza because these conflicts are so far away... yet so many people do even though they face problems in their home countries that are much closer, more imminent, and have greater impact on their daily lives... like inflation or climate change or increased government tyranny.
The point is that it doesn't make sense from a logical point of view to reject a shitty government for being authoritarian and then disregard another shitty government that's also authoritarian, if not more so. A rational person does process both as being threats for similar reasons. That's a consistent and principled take. The one and only reason why one would cozy up to one over the other is because of ignorance, which is precisely what I think is going on here.