this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
659 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

79879 readers
3143 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There’s barely any actual 4K content you can consume.

Honestly a little surprised the IMAX guys didn't start churning out 4k+ content given that they've been in the business forever.

But I guess "IMAX in your living room" isn't as sexy when the screen is 60" rather than 60'

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You don’t even need IMAX for 4K; ordinary 35mm film can normal scan to a nice 4K video. Films shot on the 65mm IMAX cameras would probably make good 8K content, but most of that was educational films, not what most people apparently want to watch all the time.

The digital IMAX projections were actually a step backwards in resolution.

[–] hcbxzz@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

IMAX is a mess. They can't even figure out a consistent aspect ratio, so most of the content shot on IMAX is cropped after delivery.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Films shot on the 65mm IMAX cameras would probably make good 8K content, but most of that was educational films, not what most people apparently want to watch all the time.

Sure. But the cameras exist. You can use them for other stuff.

Hateful Eight was filmed in 70mm, and while it wasn't Tarantino's best work it certainly looked nice.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago

65mm is a gulf from 15/65 though. Much harder to shoot in IMAX format.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago

IMAX film is equivalent to 12K. Their digital laser projectors are only 4K.

[–] AniZaeger@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Films shot on the 65mm IMAX cameras would probably make good 8K content

So there's still hope that they might release The Last Buffalo in 8k 3D sometime in the future? Got it. :)

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago

They don't want IMAX in your living room, they want IMAX in the IMAX theater, where you pay a premium for their service.

[–] worhui@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

IMAX is 4K or less content. Its edge is special projection that can look good and brighter on huge screens.

Only imax film prints are significantly better than anything else