this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
89 points (96.8% liked)
Technology
80724 readers
3450 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Y'all obviously lead with AI and you're bad at propaganda.
Run your shit against tenable once in a while.
The point of the article is to show that with help of AI, attacks can be executed faster, which means higher success chance for getting more data/damage as you're essentially running against time.
How long would all this have taken without automation?
According to you all shorter because AI is simultaneously garbage propping upa bubble, so my sarcastic answer is it's slower.
That being said I know I could detect and scan, with nessus/snyk/security hub and detect the issue inside of 5 minutes. Probably another half hour to hour for a proper pen tester to send an AWS exploit package at it and own the rest within an hour or two.
How many people do you think catch exploits in the first day or even week or month of a hack? I've got some news for you, its only the companies who really need their shit together and have a strong opssec team. They ain't going deleting buckets. They sit on it for months and years in most post mortem.