None of your comments have been longer than 2 sentences. The one you left replying to my long one explaining why I don't think it makes sense to call China authoritarian unless you also apply that label to Europe suggested that you didn't read my comment, yet you said that I am posting ignorance and lies. I am trying to understand why you think that I wrote lies and ignorant things without reading my comment.

The ability to preternaturally know when someone is lying to me without even hearing what they say sounds like a really cool superpower and if I could learn how you do that, it'd be great.

[–] keepthepace@tarte.nuage-libre.fr -4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

None of your comments have been longer than 2 sentences.

There is one I explain why. The fact you don't like its content does not invalidate it.

[–] FunkyStuff@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, that one's 3 sentences. My bad. I've read it like 15 times. I don't think I understand your reasoning as to how I'm lying yet. You don't know that I'm not a bot and you don't want to talk with me. Fine. But you're saying that I lied, when it appears you didn't read what I wrote.

[–] keepthepace@tarte.nuage-libre.fr -4 points 3 hours ago

Maybe a 16th time and you will get the difference between "lie" and "willful ignorance"