this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
421 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

80916 readers
4716 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Imagine how improved things would be if that $700 billion was spent improving the lives of regular people. Or, what if it was just used to pay the debt through taxes? Medicare for all? They clearly had the money to sqander.

[–] vodka@feddit.org 37 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Surely it'll trickle down this time?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Any second now. Maybe just one more tax cut for the rich just to be safe.

/s

[–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

There enlies a great response to people who insist we cannot resist progress (AI) and it's totally inevitable. If they believe in that progress so much, they can choose from any previous innovation that didn't bring the thing they say AI will bring.

[–] itistime@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

Oh, they do trickle down on ya! Not with what want ya though

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Meanwhile they can't figure out why not enough ~~consumers~~ ~~wage slaves~~ children are born

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Don't worry. They'll "solve" the problem with abortion bans.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And rolling back things like marital rape laws. And perhaps we were a little hasty allowing women to have their own checking accounts (IN 1974). Etc...

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Don't even get them started on the right to vote.

[–] itistime@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago

Interviewer: Margaret Atwood, what are your thoughts on the trend in the US?

Atwood: I’m Canadian

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People have already "solved" that problem by simply giving up on sex. We are headed into Japan territory.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Exactly. Without immigration, our population would collapse. Our birthrate is 1.64 per woman. Japan's is 1.2. The replacement rate is 2. It's just too damn expensive to have kids, put a roof over our heads, and retire. Meanwhile the fed just funnels more money to the rich. No wonder the workers can't maintain the population: we're starving and the government is giving all the food to the rich.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 2 points 1 day ago

To then discover people are so glued to their phone filled to the brim with anger inducing engagement, they don't have any energy left over to meet people or even do the deed.