this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
1633 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

81026 readers
5214 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fizzle@quokk.au 131 points 2 days ago (4 children)

"I categorically cannot trust tech companies with that kind of personal data," wrote one frustrated user, with many hoping they might be able to convince Discord to do a U-turn with enough public pressure. Others went further. "What a great way to kill your community," added another longtime user, while some predicted "that’s game over for Discord" and remarked ruefully that "privacy on the internet is truly dead".

LOL. Just like Netflix price increases, or reddit third party apps thing, the protest will barely register in usage metrics and discord will carry on.

These companies have effectively infinite resources with which to test changes with user reference groups, model potential outcomes, and mitigate risks. It's pure hubris to suggest that you have a better understanding of Discord's user base than they do.

The vaaast majority of users will just do the video age test and never think about it again.

[–] brap@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Man 100%. Every now and then you hear that Facebook is “hemorrhaging users” or “it’s all over” but most normal people just don’t give a fuck and use it because they’re already there and their friends are too. This’ll be no different.

[–] criscodisco@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I’ve been off Facebook for at least 15 years. I’ve been trying to move people away from it for so long, or at least getting people to stop sharing shit about their kids, but a lot of people use it as their primary means of communication, news, photo sharing, etc. I just don’t get it. I do think most people I know just have ghost accounts now, though. But for some, Facebook is their internet. When they send me Facebook links, I just don’t interact with it at all. I don’t know what they sent me because I refuse to click the link, and even if I did, Facebook is blocked by my firewall and DNS so I won’t even be able to see it without getting around my own network. I just don’t even respond.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

hmm idk, i only know like 2 people in my life that still use Facebook heavily. i know it's different in India though.

Facebook has seen stagnation or user drops in most mature markets, it's still growing in growing markets. India especially represents like half of all Facebook now.

no idea where you might be from, but this is not a globally universal issue. this will likely play out differently in different markets.

[–] These_Opposite4228@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

In India, it's pretty much the old generation and elders who use it due to old habit I think. Most kids nowadays use instagram.

[–] brap@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

That’s a real good point. Here in the UK I’m the only one out of my friends group who doesn’t use it. Here’s me also jumping to conclusions that it’s the same everywhere !

[–] zensanto@ttrpg.network 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I dunno about netflix, but at least the reddit debacle diverted a lot of users to the fediverse.

If we get a similar exodus from discord to matrix, that would work wonders for spreading the fediverse to others. Most of them still haven't even heard of it.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

I mean, do you want more people on the fediverse or not?

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Thats not my point though.

At the time reddit closed their API to third parties loads of idiots were saying it was the end of reddit.

In reality reddit just sanitised their user base.

[–] zensanto@ttrpg.network 22 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In reality, reddit gave a userbase to a platform that previously had none.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au -5 points 1 day ago

... and yet, that's not what im talking about.

[–] TheSeveralJourneysOfReemus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you call that sanitised...

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 3 points 1 day ago

Well they got rid of the users they didn't want so from their perspective, yeah.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

They lowered the lowest common denominator by driving away the users that wouldn't tolerate their BS.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Idk, they lose users from stuff like this. For every one real user they lose, they are picking up several fake ones, the mechanized troll divisions, loitering chatbots with air support and artillery cover from amplifier accounts, influence agents, and political support to back them up.

The internet is dead, and those metrics are not the real metrics, the traffic from fake users, inauthentic users, is now greater than real people using the internet it's been reported.

So your metrics might even go up in user numbers/volume. It doesn't mean real people didn't leave, and while your value might not decrease having fake users and bots fill the void, the real value of that website decreases, and that real value will show through eventually.