this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
350 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

81118 readers
4139 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive.

During the Super Bowl, Anthropic ran a dystopian AI ad about dystopian AI ads featuring an AI android physical trainer hawking insoles to a user who only asked for an ab workout. Not to be outdone, Amazon ran a commercial for its AI assistant Alexa+ in which Chris Hemsworth fretted over all the different ways AI might kill him, including severing his head and drowning him in his pool. Equally bleak, the telehealth company Hims & Hers ran an ad titled “RICH PEOPLE LIVE LONGER” in which oligarchs access such healthcare luxuries as facelifts, bespoke IVs, and “preventative care” to live longer than the rest of us. It was an anti-billionaire ad by a multibillion-dollar healthcare company.

Turn on the TV today, and you will drown in a sea of ads in which capitalists denounce capitalism. Think of the PNC Bank ads where parents sell their children’s naming rights a la sports stadiums for the money to raise them or the Robinhood ads where a white-haired older man, perhaps meant to evoke Bernie Sanders or Jeremy Corbyn, curses the “men of means with their silver spoons eating up the financial favors of the one percent” from the deck of a yacht.

After years of ingesting the mainstream discourse around surveillance capitalism, Occupy Wall Street, and democratic socialism, corporations are regurgitating and even surpassing the rhetoric of the modern left. Naturally, it’s all a winking sleight of hand meant to corral us back into engaging with the same capitalism they portray as a hellscape — but with new and improved privatized solutions. In another widely reviled Super Bowl ad, the video doorbell company Ring tells us that every year, 10 million family pets go missing, and by opting into a web of mass surveillance, the company has reunited “more than a dog a day” with their families.

Modern advertisers descend from those ad men of the 1960s who first perfected the art of channeling our angst with society writ large into buying more junk. As historian Thomas Frank wrote in his book “The Conquest of Cool,” midcentury advertisers constructed “a cultural perpetual motion machine in which disgust with the … everyday oppressions of consumer society could be enlisted to drive the ever-accelerating wheels of consumption.”

The machine has hummed on ever since, retrofitting capitalism’s reprimands into its rationales. It churns out commercials reframing the precariat’s pain not as the product of plutocracy but as the product of buying the wrong products. Advertisements pitch that the good life is to be secured by procuring high quality goods, by curating the right combination of AI assistants, locally crafted beer, paraben-free dryer sheets, Jimmy Dean breakfast biscuits, Capital One Venture X points, BetMGM spreads, Coinbase crypto wallets, on and on.

It’s lunacy. Buying Levi’s won’t give you deep pockets. Brand promises, like all promises, are made to be broken. As AI anxiety fueled fears of mass layoffs, Coca-Cola soothed American workers’ worries about “AI coming for everything” with a glossy 2025 Super Bowl ad, featuring Lauren London, where the gleaming actress flexed her dimples and told us everything would be all right. Ten months later, Coke automated its advertising with generative videos, replacing the actors they’d paid to soothe our worries about being replaced by AI with AI itself.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Well... maybe not.

I do think we're running into a problem of net in exceeding net out with modern tech and finance companies. They've surpassed the point at which they can generate meaningful amounts of profit because they've cartelized all the major profit centers.

But the idea that there's nothing left to improve, nothing left to repair, and no one left to consumerize... no, obviously not. The market system isn't failing. It is being failed by business leaders that no longer want to do the hard work of management, innovation, and improvement.

Look outside the US and you can find everything from massive overhauls in modern infrastructure to breakthroughs in manufacturing and miniaturization to exciting modernization in entertainment and sports. Within the US, though, its just slop.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Please don't confuse actual technological progress with markets. These two things have always been separate. The intellectual property market is a huge problem for innovation, and it exists because the market system is inherently a resource control system, and resource control systems that are driven by market dynamics are huge problems for innovation.

Modern infrastructure is not built by markets. University materials research is not driven by markets.

Exciting modernization in entertainment and sports

Whut?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Please don’t confuse actual technological progress with markets.

Consumer goods are delivered through market distributions for nearly every post-industrial society on earth.

The government could distribute widgets, but it doesn't.

Modern infrastructure is not built by markets.

Construction crews, materials purveyors, architects, electricians/plumbers... All come through the market system. That's why Americans have to turn to Spain or Japan every time they float the idea of expanding HSR. That's why only two companies in the world build civilian airliners. That's why our telecom network is an oligopoly.

Whut?

Teqball's a lot of fun.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

Th exception proves the rule. Department of Transportation is not market driven. DPW is not market driven. Army Corps of Engineers is not market driven.

And that's just the US. Look to the rest of the world and you'll see that most infrastructure is not market driven at all.

And even in the cases where they have to get private companies to do the build, the INFRASTRUCTURE ITSELF is not market driven, it's the talent that's market driven.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Modern infrastructure is not built by markets. University materials research is not driven by markets.

It kind of is, though. Modern infrastructure is built by companies. Universities acquire materials, labor, as well as share knowledge through marketplaces of ideas and information.

"Market" is really just a construct describing social interaction. You can't really blame it for a problem since all it is is a description of reality.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You don't know what markets are then.

Modern infrastructure in China is built by state owned enterprises and funded by the government. There is no price competition, and the infrastructure is not sold on the market as a commodity.

"Marketplaces of ideas and information" would be places where you could purchase ideas and information and resell them. That's what a market is. That's not how universities work. They receive planned funding for planned research and conduct planned research according to forward looking plans without regard to the market demand for specific outcomes. Granted IP markets are layered on top of that but they pervert the entire process and they are totally artificial.

The idea that you think markets are not actual systems but just a descriptive word used to refer to various non-marker realities indicates that you are fully saturated with neoliberalism and need a detox.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Markets are not uniquely neoliberal nor capitalist.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No. But describing all social interactions as "markets" is distinctly Neoliberal brain rot

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

No, I said markets describe a type of social interaction. You inferred all.

[–] frisbird@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 hours ago

You said universities share information in "marketplaces of ideas".