this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
298 points (96.6% liked)
Technology
84069 readers
3783 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
He’s not telling you to be terrified of the single bot writing a blog post. He’s telling you to be terrified of the blog post being ingested by other bots and then seen as a source of truth. Resulting in AI recruiters automatically rejecting his resume for job postings. Or for other agents deciding to harass him for the same reason.
Edit: I do agree with you that he was a little lenient with how he speaks about the capabilities of it. The fact that they are incompetent and still seen as a source of truth for so many is what alarms me
You're describing things that people can do. In fact, maybe it was just a person.
If he thinks all those things are bad, he should be "terrified" that bloggers can blog anonymously already.
Edit: I agree with your edit
The "bot blog poisoning other bots against you and getting your job applications auto-rejected" isn't really something that would play out with people.
They're called rumors
Rumors don't work remotely the same way as the suggested scenario.
It's a 1:1 correlation. Are you not familiar with any of the age-old cautionary tales about them?
https://youtu.be/ajBrcoEQauU
Its not a 1:1 correlation. The efficacy of an AI spreading a rumor to other AI has the potential to be far more rapid, pervasive, and much more dangerous than humans spreading rumors amongst themselves.
Are you saying you have specific evidence of this (then please do show exactly how AI will do something people haven't already), or are you saying "potential" because you don't?
Obviously its my opinion, but you don't have evidence that people spreading rumors is just as effective either, so nice gotcha. Nice try.
I know we live in a post-truth world, but your aggressive refusal to acknowledge decades (if not centuries) of reality, in order to freak out over baseless fantasy, is a disturbing example of that.