Selfhosted

60093 readers

815 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam.
Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require your active participation in selfhosting or related communities, or the post will be removed. No more than 10% of your posts or comments may be self-promotional, or your post will be removed. F/LOSS Exception: If your post is about a project that is completely open source & can be self-hosted in full without payment, and your account is at least 30 days old, your post is exempt from this rule as long as you continue to engage in comments.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

Is it feasible to run a TURN server behind NAT? (lemmy.ca)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by hackysphere@lemmy.ca to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am running a defederated local Matrix server, and I need to set up calls. From what I can tell, the "legacy" calls require a STUN and TURN server, and the new MatrixRTC standard seems to require them as well for Livekit to work. However, I do not want to expose anything out to the public internet, as I want everything to be behind NAT for local access only (all of the clients for the server will also be behind the NATted network). I also have Tailscale running on my servers, and it would be useful if I would be able to connect to the TURN server even when not in the network. Is there a way to get STUN/TURN to work in this situation? It seems that all the servers expect to have public network access.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] stratself@lemdro.id 1 points 4 months ago

If you want a non-federating LAN-only Matrix server, then STUN/TURN can be behind the NAT. Since you have Tailscale, STUN/TURN can also expose itself on the Tailscale VPN too. Just configure proper DNS records per-interface and you should be fine.

Since calls are p2p, the purpose of STUN is to determine a client's (usually public) IP address, and TURN is to relay the connection if they can't connect directly (i.e. behind NAT). If your clients are on the same LAN/VPN with unrestrictive firewalls then you might not even need any STUN/TURN altogether.