this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2026
145 points (98.7% liked)
Technology
81611 readers
4581 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I wouldn't use Mullvad when it's openly hostile to peer-to-peer torrenting. Even outside of the obvious – piracy is one of the best and most unique use cases for a VPN – I use torrents wherever the option is available for legal downloads because that's normally faster, spares a load on the server, and strengthens the download's resiliency. That Mullvad wants to restrict that is their (reasonable) call, but it's not one that's going to get my money.
I've been using Mullvad for awhile now and torrenting works fine.
I did notice a behaviour that LibTorrent 1.2.x works better than 2.x and some endpoints don't play nice.
If you're willing to give it another spin try Netherlands.
They don't explicitly ban torrenting, but they banned port forwarding in 2023 which heavily limits who you can connect to.
Ah I see what you mean.
It relies on the other side to have an open NAT or support UDP hole punching.
In my experience this works fairly well with μTP enabled.