this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
61 points (90.7% liked)

Technology

69247 readers
3801 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

๐Ÿงฎ Decentralization Scoring System (v1.3)

This scoring system evaluates how decentralized and self-hostable a platform is, based on four core metrics.

๐Ÿ“Š Scoring Metrics (Total: 100 Points)

Metric Weight Description
Top Provider User Share 30 Measures how many users are on the largest instance. Full points if <20%; 0 if >80%.
Top Provider Content Share 30 Measures how much content is hosted by the largest instance. Full points if <20%; 0 if >80%.
Ease of Self-Hosting: Server 20 Technical ease of running your own backend. Full points for simple setup with good docs.
Ease of Self-Hosting: User Interface 20 Availability and usability of clients. Full points for accessible, FOSS, multi-platform clients.

๐Ÿ“‹ Example Breakdown (Estimates)

Platform Score Visualization
๐Ÿ“ง Email 95 ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ
๐Ÿน Lemmy 79 ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ
๐Ÿ˜ Mastodon 74 ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ
๐ŸŸฃ PeerTube 94 ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ๐ŸŸฉ
๐Ÿ–ผ Pixelfed 42 ๐ŸŸง๐ŸŸง๐ŸŸง๐ŸŸง๐ŸŸง๐ŸŸง๐ŸŸง๐ŸŸง
๐Ÿ”ต Bluesky 14 ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ๐ŸŸฅ
๐ŸŸฅ Reddit 3 ๐ŸŸฅ

๐Ÿ“ง Email

  • Top Provider User Share: Google โ‰ˆ 17% โ†’ Score: 30/30
  • Top Provider Content Share: Google handles โ‰ˆ 17% of mail โ†’ Score: 30/30
  • Self-Hosting: Server: Easy (Can leverage hundreds of email hosting options) โ†’ Score: 16/20
  • Self-Hosting: Client: Easy (Thunderbird, K-9, etc.) โ†’ Score: 19/20

Total: 95/100


๐Ÿน Lemmy

  • Top Provider User Share: lemmy.world โ‰ˆ 37% โ†’ Score: 21.5/30
  • Top Provider Content Share: lemmy.world hosts โ‰ˆ 37% content โ†’ Score: 21.5/30
  • Self-Hosting: Server: Easy (Docker, low resource) โ†’ Score: 18/20
  • Self-Hosting: Client: Good FOSS apps, web UI โ†’ Score: 18/20

Total: 79/100


๐Ÿ˜ Mastodon

  • Top Provider User Share: mastodon.social โ‰ˆ 40% โ†’ Score: 20/30
  • Top Provider Content Share: mastodon.social โ‰ˆ 45โ€“50% content โ†’ Score: 20/30
  • Self-Hosting: Server: Docker setup, moderate difficulty โ†’ Score: 15/20
  • Self-Hosting: Client: Strong ecosystem (Tusky, web, etc.) โ†’ Score: 19/20

Total: 74/100


๐ŸŸฃ PeerTube

  • Top Provider User Share: wirtube.de โ‰ˆ 14% โ†’ Score: 30/30
  • Top Provider Content Share: Approximately 14% โ†’ Score: 30/30
  • Self-Hosting: Server: Docker, active community, moderate resources โ†’ Score: 16/20
  • Self-Hosting: Client: Web-first UI, FOSS, some mobile options โ†’ Score: 18/20

Total: 94/100


๐Ÿ–ผ Pixelfed

  • Top Provider User Share: pixelfed.social โ‰ˆ 71% โ†’ Score: 4.5/30
  • Top Provider Content Share: Approximately 71% โ†’ Score: 4.5/30
  • Self-Hosting: Server: Laravel-based, Docker available, some config needed โ†’ Score: 15/20
  • Self-Hosting: Client: Web UI, FOSS, mobile apps in progress โ†’ Score: 18/20

Total: 42/100


๐Ÿ”ต Bluesky

  • Top Provider User Share: bsky.social โ‰ˆ 99% โ†’ Score: 0/30
  • Top Provider Content Share: Nearly all content on bsky.social โ†’ Score: 0/30
  • Self-Hosting: Server: PDS hosting possible but very niche and poorly documented โ†’ Score: 4/20
  • Self-Hosting: Client: Mostly official client; some 3rd party โ†’ Score: 10/20

Total: 14/100


๐ŸŸ  Reddit

  • Top Provider User Share: Reddit hosts 100% of user accounts โ†’ Score: 0/30
  • Top Provider Content Share: Reddit hosts all user-generated content โ†’ Score: 0/30
  • Self-Hosting: Server: Not self-hostable (proprietary platform) โ†’ Score: 0/20
  • Self-Hosting: Client: Some unofficial clients available โ†’ Score: 3/20

Total: 3/100


How Scores are Calculated

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿคโ€๐Ÿง‘ How User/Content Share Scores Work

This measures how many users are on the largest provider (or instance).

  • No provider > 20%: If no provider has more than 20%, it gets full 30 points.
  • Between 20% and 80%: Anything in between is scored on a linear scale.
  • > 80%: If a provider has more than 80%, it gets 0 points.

๐Ÿ“Š Formula:

Score = 30 ร— (1 - (TopProviderShare - 20) / 60)
โ€ฆbut only if TopProviderShare is between 20% and 80%.
If below 20%, full 30. If above 80%, zero.

๐Ÿ“Œ Example:

If one provider has 40% of all users:
โ†’ Score = 30 ร— (1 - (40 - 20) / 60) = 30 ร— (1 - 0.43) = 17.1 points

๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ How Ease of Self-Hosting Scores Work

These scores measure how easy it is for individuals or communities to run their own servers or use clients.

This looks at how technically easy it is to run your own backend (e.g., email server, Mastodon server) or User Interface (e.g., web-interface or mobile-app)

  • Very Easy: One-command or setup wizard, great documentation โ†’ 18โ€“20 points
  • Moderate: Docker or manual setup, some config, active community support โ†’ 13โ€“17 points
  • Hard: Complex setup, needs regular updates or custom config, poor documentation โ†’ 6โ€“12 points
  • Very Hard or Proprietary: Little to no self-hosting support, undocumented โ†’ 0โ€“5 points

๐Ÿ“š Sources

Footnotes

This is a work in progress and may contain mistakes. If you have ideas or suggestions for improvement, feel free to let me know.

Source: https://github.com/NoBadDays/decentralization-score/blob/main/decentralization_score_2025.04.md

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] demesisx@infosec.pub 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This is really cool.

It reminds me of the Edinburgh Decentralisation Index: an academically rigorous decentralization index that the university of Glasgow school of informatics devised to quanitfy the decentralization of cryptocurrencies:

The Edinburgh Decentralisation Index (EDI) studies blockchain decentralisation from first principles, archives relevant datasets, develops metrics, and offers a dashboard to track decentralisation trends over time and across systems.

https://informatics.ed.ac.uk/blockchain/edi

You should give it a serious look. IMO, it would offer some insight into academically peer-reviewed ways of quantifying this kind of thing.

[โ€“] AnonomousWolf@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

That's fascinating, Hopefully we can eventually get such a thorough breakdown of the decentralization of online services.