this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2026
88 points (74.2% liked)

Technology

81611 readers
6021 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
88
systemd has been a complete, utter, unmitigated success (blog.tjll.net)
submitted 10 hours ago by lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world
60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 hours ago (7 children)

can someone please tell me how to make .mount files start at boot for smb shares ffs? is the only thing systemd is failing for me.

[–] Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works 17 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I dont know what you are doing, but I have my smb shares simply in fstab and never heard of any .mount file

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

On modern systems, fstab entries are read by systemd and .mount files are automatically created for each entry. 😄

[–] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 hours ago

i am making them in salt-stack systemd templates/pillars. i will see what i miss when i do a fstab one.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 4 points 9 hours ago

Systemd can use .mount files to make services and stuff depend on the availability of a mount. They can either be created by hand or are created automatically from fstab.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

My nfs mounts always add 1:45 to my boot even though I added _netdev to their lines in fstab. I don't get it.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Use

_netdev,nofail,x-systemd.device-timeout=10s

nofail doesn't interrupt the boot and 10 seconds is a more sane timeout. You can also use

x-systemd.automount

And it will automatically mount the directory the first time it is accessed.

[–] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 hours ago

thanks everyone.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 5 points 9 hours ago

IIRC You simply write/change the fstab as in every system. Then you say "systemctl daemon-reload" once, and this (re)creates your .mount files. Then "mount -a" or whatever you need.

[–] hesh@quokk.au 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Can you see if its trying and failing by using journalctl?

[–] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 hours ago

no matter what i do it only does on try.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Network not ready by time the mount is executed?

[–] Eryn6844@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

yup,

[–] tinsuke@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I have a service that pings the server:

cat <<EOF | sudo tee /etc/systemd/system/ping-smb.service
[Unit]
Description=Blocks until pinging 192.168.1.10 succeeds
After=network-online.target
StartLimitIntervalSec=0

[Service]
Type=oneshot
ExecStart=ping -c1 192.168.1.10
Restart=on-failure
RestartSec=1

[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
EOF

sudo systemctl enable ping-smb.service

And then I make the fstab entry depend on it:

x-systemd.requires=ping-smb.service
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

I had something similar when I used to mount an NFS share. I had a bash line that would loop ping and then mount once ping succeeds. Having a separate service that pings and making the mount dependent on it is probably the better thing to do. Should also work when put in Requires= in a .mount file.