this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
653 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

82000 readers
3563 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] sibachian@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

but this is really only true and a problem for the end user, and you can't maintain an empire by refusing to collaborate with the larger userbase.

that's how Adobe became an industry standard. They eventually claimed the larger userbase and businesses had to adapt or spend millions on training.

[โ€“] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

"The end-user" is another way to say "everyone in the developed world", and nobody is refusing to collaborate with Microsoft here. What has happened is that Microsoft then agreed to collaborate, did so in bad faith, and released what they are calling and open standard, but it is neither open nor standard.

OnlyOffice appears to be trying their best to adhere to this "standard", but their best efforts are still resulting in substantial rendering differences of the same document in OnlyOffice and Word. That means to me that at least one of the following must be true:

  • every of the many 3rd party attempts to adhere to the standard was done poorly and failed
  • the standard does not work or is not strict enough to be possible to adhere to
  • the standard is intentionally sabotaged so that it cannot work

The dubious events around the establishment and adoption of this "standard" make me lean strongly toward the 3rd option,which is in keeping with entire documented history of Microsoft's hostile, aggressive, and bad faith business practices.