this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
962 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

81802 readers
4971 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The creator of Nearby Glasses made the app after reading 404 Media's coverage of how people are using Meta's Ray-Bans smartglasses to film people without their knowledge or consent. “I consider it to be a tiny part of resistance against surveillance tech.”

more at: @feed@404media.co

https://tech.lgbt/@yjeanrenaud/116122129025921096

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nednobbins@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

I dislike Facebook and deleted my account even before they changed to "Meta". I also value privacy.

But what privacy violations do "smart glasses" provide that weren't already trivially available? Tiny cameras are insanely cheap. A reasonably handy person could hide several on their person and there are plenty of "spy shops" that sell actual wearable hidden cameras.

The "I love ICE" kid was wearing Meta Ray Bans but the first video I saw of it was from someone else' camera. I can't leave the house without getting filmed from multiple angles. The only thing those glasses do is make it really obvious that the wearer is a dumbass.

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

The main differences I can think of are:

  • Better video quality
  • More normalized
  • Easier to get your hands on
  • They look like raybans and are brand name
  • They're debatibly "cool"
  • Also Facebook is involved

Basically they produce better video and are more normalized in society.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The difference is that meta glasses constantly upload to their creepy servers to do automatic face recognition.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

True, but understand, every wireless-connected smart device you wear or interact with in any way is doing the same.

Meta's nonsense isn't unique, and should be regulated into nonexistence, but unless you're keeping your phone in a Faraday bag you too are being constantly filmed, tracked, and snooped upon.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

No, my iPhone is not doing that because they give you a switch to turn it off and encrypt anything Apple touches. It disables some handy features but it’s a worthwhile trade off in my opinion.

[–] chaotic_ugly@lemmy.zip -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Found the fanboy.

"HEY GUYS IT'S NO BIG DEAL NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT. I DISLIKE FACEBOOK BUT DEFINITELY DON'T SEE THE PROBLEM WITH THESE ALWAYS ON SPY DEVICES THAT ARE CONSTANTLY CONNECTED TO DEMONSTRABLY EVIL PEOPLE"

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Not actually what they said, though.

[–] chaotic_ugly@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago

Downplaying in the war for privacy is vouching for the enemy.