this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
943 points (80.7% liked)

Memes

49930 readers
793 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Liz@midwest.social 5 points 3 days ago (10 children)

I mean, I want to replace FPTP though. Any kind of proportional system is ideal, but Sequential Proportional Approval Voting is ideal.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (7 children)

Democrats hugely benefit from FPTP so they will never advocate for replacing it.

It is a catch22 where the only answer is to call the Democrats bluff and vote for other parties until the Democrats cave to voter demands.

Democrats also refuse to acknowledge that not voting for them is the only way left to pressure them.

[–] Liz@midwest.social 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I will advocate to replace it when I'm in office and a Democrat, against the protests of some of my co-workers. As the other commenter pointed out, Newsom killed an anti-FPTP bill, but that means there's enough support in the California legislature to get a bill to his desk.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Democrats will pull every dirty trick they never use against Republicans as soon as the duopoly is endangered.

[–] Liz@midwest.social -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Man, I guess there's no point in even trying to improve the system if there's going to be opposition.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

You cannot improve the system it is fully outside of your control. Only an illusion of control is left.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)