this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
562 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

82131 readers
4575 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 102 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How will this affect embedded os like freertos or vxworks? There are lightbulbs that have operating systems these days, am I going to have to show ID to turn on my light?

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 day ago

My guess would be these OS's just wont do it and stop doing business in that state.

Lucky for you, you can just download them anyway.

My guess is also that these lawmakers dont care nor considered other OS's than Windows, MacOS, iOS and Android.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As those are not general purpose computing devices, and additionally have no app store - no, and no.

From the law text:

(c) “Application” means a software application that may be run or directed by a user on a computer, a mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device that can access a covered application store or download an application.

[–] dondelelcaro@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The law defines a public webpage as a covered app store. Anything that can run doom and view a webpage is potentially covered.

It's way overbroad and unclear how it could be implemented, and likely to be challenged in court if it even gets that far.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Definitely broad and "just trust us bro" energy.

I'm looking for orgs fighting the Colorado one. I got "replaced" by AI recently, so I have all the time in the world to write letters, make calls, and go to town halls. I just don't want to do it alone.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

cool, then neither is my desktop pc. i get all my software on 5 1/4" floppies.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The quote is that it can download an application though

[–] lime@feddit.nu 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

it can't.

try to disprove me.

[–] despoticruin@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 hours ago

I forgot to include nm and wpa supplicant to my arch install before I committed it to disk and am now stuck installing everything from offline pacman caches carried to my via local homeless people in the form of random USB sticks found in parking lots. Prove me wrong.

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

It all but makes the law useless, but the law characterizes viable age verification as being self reported, so the Id wouldn't be necessary.