this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
1188 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

82131 readers
4233 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 28 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

My biggest concern is the life cycle of the device. I almost went with Motorola for my last phone, but saw that you were lucky to get 3 years of OS updates. Is that likely to be better on GrapheneOS? If so, that is a huge win imo. If not, it still isn't ideal because I don't want to have to buy a new phone every 2 years...

[–] Willdrick@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Thats the trick, when a company supports romming, you can extend the support for however long you want!

[–] huggingstars@programming.dev 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

GrapheneOS was claiming 5-year support IIRC. Apple level support is infeasible. Not sure how affordable longer firmware support from Qualcomm is.

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Why do you think they are $300-500? I don't care about "only" 3 years of updates if i don't have to spend $1300 on a friggin cellphone.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I mean, I sort of get what you are saying but it also feels a little like Grimes's boots thing from Terry Pratchet. Like, I can spend $200- $300 and get a phone that will stop getting security updates in 2-3 years... Or I can spend $700-$1000 to get a phone that comes with 7-10 years of security updates. Money per year, you are the same or better off if you can afford the up-front cost of the more expensive product, and we are generating a lot less techno-garbage clogging up the planet.

Generally, I hate the hard limit of use of these things. Coming from desktop computers, if you spend more money the machine is faster, but if you don't need the speed you can use the cheap machine just as long (or longer if you really don't need performance). All phones feel like they are just a subscription model.

[–] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Reading the original press release might be a good Start

Their Thinkphones pretty much always had good update policy

Almost like you cant really sell a 100€ device and expect it to be optimised like a mid range