this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
540 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

82131 readers
4146 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 11 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

The law does not require photo ID uploads or facial recognition, with users instead simply self-reporting their age, setting AB 1043 apart from similar laws passed in Texas and Utah that require "commercially reasonable" verification methods, such as government-issued ID checks.

I hate Newsom but this seems like a non-issue.

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

If it was a non-issue they wouldn't introduce this to begin with.

There's not a single good reason to why an OS would ever need to know someone's age.

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

One of the proposed ideas in a Discord-based thread was to use OS-level age authentication to prevent you from having to provide IDs to a thousand other parties. One place, one time. So that's one reason for an OS to need it, in a world hellbent on increasing age restrictions. I don't know enough about that idea to argue it, though I'm certain it could be spoofed in 0.2 seconds after release.

It sounded like the EU solution is a dedicated, non-identifying birth date tag in their passports.

But what do I know. I assume all age restrictions can be circumvented, so I see no point in all this theater. And it's theater because it never really seems to truly be about protecting children. At least, to me, I'd be more concerned about SFW manosphere bullshit than NSFW porn when it comes to protecting kids (yes, I'm well aware a great deal of porn is misogynistic, degrading, abusive, etc)

[–] forestbeasts@pawb.social 3 points 3 hours ago

Man, it's so weird to think about misogynistic/degrading/abusive porn existing. I'm used to furry porn which, generally, is much more positive "yay let's do [insert rule 34 of literally anything you could possibly think of] and have a great time!" type stuff.

-- Frost

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

But you can just lie lol

That's what I always did as a kid. Maybe some good reasons not to do that, but that's still the reality of it.

[–] bearboiblake@pawb.social 5 points 4 hours ago

Thin end of the wedge. Authoritarianism and fascism comes little by little.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 hours ago

it established a bad precedent

[–] freedom@lemy.lol 7 points 6 hours ago

It’s a muddy slope. Watch your step.