this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2026
544 points (90.6% liked)

Memes

55522 readers
1075 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] F_State@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Marx was a social scientist, not a prophet. Marxism is a science, not a dogma. Marx's work should be studied, I feature his works in my basic Marxist-Leninist study guide, but that does not mean that Marx's words are holy. Marxist concepts have been extended and explained in ways more applicable to contemporary times, retaining Marxism as the foundation and applying it to present, ever-changing conditions. It's this flexibility and evolution of Marxism that turns it into a science, rather than a dogma.

One does not need to read On the Origin of Species to be taught and study evolution. Still a good idea to, but if textbooks that study the same basis and carry it forward to the modern day are created, then this is also good.

[–] F_State@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's more or less what every Marxist and Marxist-Leninist really needs to hear.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Sure, I agree, thats's why Mao wrote Oppose Book Worship. Marxism is a guide to action, and a science that evolves.

[–] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Christian teachings weren't written by Christ, people wrote about Darwinism that aren't Darwin, a person can be the namesake and originator of a philosophy but other scholars will continue writing based on their viewpoint.

[–] F_State@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

I mean, Christian teachings are largely Greek Philosophy grafted onto Abrahamic religion. I'm not terribly convinced early church fathers really cared what Jesus thought.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

You argue like Charlie Kirk. You think you have a clever gotcha and you can probably convince children with this, but there's no meaning. People don't read Newton when they study Newtonian mechanics either. Unless they're particularly interested; of course they can get something out of it, but you'd never start there. It's not weird to name a field after the person whose ideas kicked it off.