Technology
Which posts fit here?
Any news that are at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies or tech policy.
Post guidelines
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
view the rest of the comments
I hate these "AI is this dumb" posts because most of the time it's someone telling the AI to build a bad product just to laugh at it.
But they're still using AI.
And it's still training the AI.
It's like burning a tree down in Cali and then saying it was down to raise awareness that Forrest fires are bad....
Everyone knows it already, and you're just making an existing problem worse.
It's just clickbait, and I hate that Tom's post so much about it because it gets clicks.
I mostly agree, but Tom's/the reporter didn't vibe the product. Ze reviewed something someone else vibed.
Them promoting it makes more watch/read whatever original.
Just like OP posting this.
Can they pull a Wimp Lo and train it wrong as a joke
There's a handful of projects out there that are trying to do exactly this, by programmatically poisoning potential training data.