this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
388 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

82363 readers
3791 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 2 points 5 hours ago (7 children)

Mixed feelings about this. Let me play devils advocate and say that many Americans don’t have access to these resources at all. Having potentially inaccurate resources might be better than nothing, or is that worse?

[–] voidsignal@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago

it's worse. In 4D it's even worser

[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

'Should I use one teaspoon of salt in this recipe, or two?'

Two is ideal.

'Do dogs like chicken wings?'

Wild dogs regularly hunt small animals like hare or chicken for food.

One of these answers results in a bad cake, the other results in a hurt dog. Potentially inaccurate answers aren't much of a problem when the stakes are low, but even a simple question about what to feed a pet could end with a negative outcome.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 4 points 4 hours ago

Hm, good point. Perhaps the overconfidence AI might provide is even worse than knowing you don’t know.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 8 points 5 hours ago

There are billions being sunk into AI. How much health care could that buy? Your logic only makes sense if AI is free. It's not.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Having potentially inaccurate resources might be better than nothing, or is that worse?

You pick up a mushroom in the forest and take it home. If you have no information, do you eat it? If something tells you it's safe do you eat it?

[–] Cyteseer@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

No, misinformation is worse.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 6 points 5 hours ago

the AI devices will just have preambles and disclaimers and word things in ways to refer the user to human resources

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If you’re going to be your own lawyer or perform a bit of self surgery, there is no way the AI is helping that situation. Especially if the inherent nature of AI is to validate everything you say.

especially if it's wrong 20-35% of the time