this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
338 points (99.4% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

9493 readers
486 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 85 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

It'd be easy to remove this post for a violation of Rule 3's requirement on high-quality sources, but this is textbook leopards, so we'll work around it.

Pinning this comment so everyone has easy access to the ACLU's press release about this lawsuit which is likely to be a much better source. Here's a Charlotte Observer article about the attack. And here's the Newsweek article quoting MS NOW about the regret.

Maybe I should have a canned explanation for how trash the IBT is as a source, but as a proxy for that: we don't use it as much as we reasonably can on Wikipedia (a source which, funnily, I've seen the IBT cite for claims not about Wikipedia).

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 47 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Your comment is more work than merely removing the submission, but I, for one, highly appreciate it. I get to see the story and better sources. <3

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Tangent: I would love to see a Lemmy feature that allows community mods to unilaterally block links to specific domains within their community. So, in this case, the poster would get an immediate notification that their post was not allowed due to the link being to a low quality source, and a suggestion to find the same story on a more reputable site.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Seems like a generalized automoderator tool might be handy that would allow a wide variety of actions :)

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The irony that Newsweek is among the list seems to be lost on everyone. Fuck Newsweek.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 59 minutes ago)

agreed, but when verifying, a broad consensus among shitty sources works when you can't find good sources.

we found the charlotte observer tho so like, why newsweek.