Selfhosted

60093 readers

907 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam.
Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title.
No trolling.
Promotion posts require your active participation in selfhosting or related communities, or the post will be removed. No more than 10% of your posts or comments may be self-promotional, or your post will be removed. F/LOSS Exception: If your post is about a project that is completely open source & can be self-hosted in full without payment, and your account is at least 7 days old, your post is exempt from this rule as long as you continue to engage in comments.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

curbstickle@anarchist.nexus

curbstickle_lw@lemmy.world

253

TrueNAS build system going closed source (piefed.social)

submitted 3 months ago by Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

57 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Readme updated today:

This repository is no longer actively maintained.  

The TrueNAS build system previously hosted here has been moved to an internal infrastructure. This transition was necessary to meet new security requirements, including support for Secure Boot and related platform integrity features that require tighter control over the build and signing pipeline.  

No further updates, pull requests, or issues will be accepted. Existing content is preserved here for historical reference only.

https://github.com/truenas/scale-build

Wondering if this is just the first step towards doing a minio in the future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It can be a bit of both.

I don't think secureboot is an attack on freedom exactly (and it's certainly not an instance of EEE), but I definitely think it shouldn't be Microsoft holding the keys.

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Literally today Chris Titus released a video where he emphasized that no one should be using secure boot because the default backend is Microsoft and no one changes their secure boot config.

If that's true there's an argument that the name "secure boot" is hardly detachable from the defaults and thus that name is kid of burnt and shouldn't be recommended out of an abundance of caution for new users.

[–] Saerana@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Do you know the name of this video? I keep trying to search for a secure boot video by Chris Titus released today/yesterday but I'm not finding anything.

[–] d3lta19@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It was in his reaction video to LTT trying it Linux again

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

yeah that's the one

[–] deafboy@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

So... nobody changes the default settings, therefore everyone should change the default settings... to the wrong option?

edit: Why is it that homo sapiens is always willing to go an extra mile just to hurt itself?