this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
693 points (98.6% liked)
Technology
82518 readers
5726 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Governments wanting to identify and regulate speech under the guise of protecting children
The California law does not require age verification. Only attestation. From what I have heard the Colorado one is basically identical.
The NY one I have heard is more stringent. But I have not read that or the Colorado one.
Doesn't fucking matter. It's only a matter of time until they push for full deanonymization of everyone on the internet.
Still a 1st Amendment violation, no? Compelling speach
While I can't comment on any case law surrounding compelled speech. I don't thing that this would qualify as compelled speech.
Just based off a quick web search it seems that compelled speech is more about the government telling news organizations to report what they tell them.
Forcing someone to disclose information about themselves (age or age bracket) is compelled speech
They don't have to, they can choose not to use the internet! /s
I'd like to change timelines please and thank you