this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
57 points (98.3% liked)

Australia

4899 readers
104 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Don’t buy into the fear-mongering being pushed.

For a comfortable retirement in 2026, the amount required is ~$800K (this is already on the high end).

Assuming a consistent worst-case inflation rate of 4% every year (double the RBA target), it would take 25 years to hit $2m - let alone the $3m+ in question here.

There is a very small, very wealthy cohort with $3m+ in superannuation savings - and you, statistically speaking, aren’t part of it.

Fuck ‘em - they need to be taxed more.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (7 children)

Fuck ‘em - they need to be taxed more

You say this about the people that pay the majority of all income taxes already lol. When did this commie “successful people should be penalised more and more for being successful!” ideology become so popular in Australia?

No amount of extra tax from the wealthy is going to result in reduced taxes for everyone else. The wealthy and the high earners already pay almost all of the tax. All it’s going to do is end up in more government waste and corruption.

Also……why do they need to be taxed more? Are they using more government services than everyone else? Do they get special roads that only they get to drive on?

[–] YeahToast@aussie.zone 1 points 5 days ago (3 children)

What's your suggestion? Tax low income more? People of wealth have a significant ability to manipulate and reduce tax bills. I don't think payroll tax is the answer, but taxing wealth, assets and corporations is.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No, taxing wealth and assets isn’t the answer. People shouldn’t be punished simply for being successful and owning things.

Your last point is - making corporations actually pay taxes. No more Apple Australia buying iPhones from Apple Scotland for the exact same price they sell them to customers for, meaning no profit in Australia, for example. No more mining giants paying nothing to literally sell the ground out from under us.

Income tax should be abolished, and instead make it spending/usage based. Spend more pay more.

The only thing I agree with “taxing the rich” for is fines - they should be percentage based. $1000 for your passenger having their seatbelt slightly off hurts someone earning $60k a lot more than it hurts someone earning $600k.

[–] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's not punishment for being wealthy, it's giving back to the community that helps you live in luxury. The taxes won't send them broke, or make a big dent in their savings.

And I agree with the fines. Should be a minimum plus a percentage of your last financial year's income.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 4 days ago

It is punishment. The wealthy already “give back” far more than the rest of the population in terms of tax.

It’s just pure jealousy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)