this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
169 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

82549 readers
3885 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At a glance, the passwords the LLMs created looked secure, much like those that a password generator might spit out. But that’s exactly where the problems arose: Although the AI-generated passwords appeared to be complex and safe to use for securing online accounts, they were actually quite predictable upon closer inspection.

All three LLMs exhibited clearly identifiable patterns in how they created these passwords. These patterns included repeated character strings, predictable password structure, frequent reuse of similar characters, clear biases toward certain numbers and letters, and even duplicate passwords in some cases. Although the AI-generated passwords looked random, they really weren’t. This could easily create a false sense of security if you were to use these predictable passwords for your online accounts.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just noticing: there's 0 evidence in article that anyone is doing this. I just don't buy that this is happening enough to matter. Interesting as interpretability research at best

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

There's actually lots of evidence of people using AI to generate GUIDs that are infact not globally unique.

[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Source appreciated? Was this inside the research paper?

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

I've seen it personally at work where the AI generates its own metadata files containing uuids that it made up, and they end up being duplicates from elsewhere in the project. Unfortunately I can't really share links.

I'm sure you could find examples in GitHub issues

Edit: I had an honest look, and can't seem to find anything that isn't AI slop in web searches anymore... GUIDs aren't exactly the most common thing in the first place, so maybe I overstated how common this is.

[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Np, search is getting terrible. Thanks for looking!