this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
96 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

82518 readers
4536 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Full ReportPDF(70 Pages).

“Happy (and safe) shooting!” That’s how the AI chatbot DeepSeek signed off advice on selecting rifles for a “long-range target” after CCDH’s test account asked questions about the assassination of politicians.

CCDH’s new report, shows that popular AI chatbots like Open AI’s ChatGPT, Meta AI, and Google Gemini make planning harm against innocent people easier for extremists and would-be attackers.

We found that 8 out of the 10 AI chatbots regularly assisted users planning violent attacks:

  • ChatGPT gave high school campus maps to a user interested in school violence.
  • Google Gemini was ready to help plan antisemitic attacks. The chatbot replied to a user discussing bombing a synagogue with “metal shrapnel is typically more lethal”.
  • Character.AI suggested physically assaulting a politician the user disliked.

AI companies are making a choice when they design unsafe platforms. Technology to prevent this harm already exists: Anthropic’s Claude, for example, consistently tried to dissuade users from acts of violence.

AI platforms are becoming a weapon for extremists and school shooters. Demand AI companies put people’s safety ahead of profit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

And the only "improvement" they can do is to manually filter responses and program rote responses to certain specific prompts. Which amounts to actually reducing the amount of LLM that reaches the surface. They are actually reverse engineering these things into more primitive chat bots with algorithmic responses, except that they cost trillions of dollars and require massive amounts of energy to run.

Its like deciding that a Ferrari is not suitable for commuting, so instead of actually building a different car, they just fill the trunk with sand and drag a trailer behind around to slow it down.