this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
204 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

82518 readers
5726 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Apple MacBook Neo's $599 starting price is a "shock" to the Windows PC industry, according to an Asus executive.

Hsu said he believes all the PC players—including Microsoft, Intel, and AMD—take the MacBook Neo threat seriously. "In fact, in the entire PC ecosystem, there have been a lot of discussions about how to compete with this product," he added, given that rumors about the MacBook Neo have been making the rounds for at least a year.

Despite the competitive threat, Hsu argued that the MacBook Neo could have limited appeal. He pointed to the laptop's 8GB of "unified memory," or what amounts to its RAM, and how customers can't upgrade it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 38 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

He pointed to the laptop’s 8GB of “unified memory,” or what amounts to its RAM, and how customers can’t upgrade it.

Given the price of RAM, you'd need to sell a kidney to upgrade it in a Windows laptop these days, so that's not much of a difference, although 8MB is a little skimpy, I'll give him that one.

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 11 points 13 hours ago

[…] although 8MB is a little skimpy

Have we already downgraded to this???

/s, and sorry for being pedantic

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca -4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

or what amounts to its RAM

You can criticize the amount of RAM, but it’s still RAM. Clown.

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

They’re hinting at the fact that those 8GB are shared between the CPU and GPU. So it’s not dedicated, which you’d expect if someone said “RAM.”

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

RAM is RAM. If you take issue with it being unified say so, but it’s still RAM.

He sounds like he’s grasping.

The neo is going to eat his lunch, and he knows it.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

If you take issue with it being unified say so, but it’s still RAM.

He did say so. 8GB unified when a Linux laptop has 8GB of ram and an Nvidia 5050 with 8 GB of VRAM is 16GB of Ram despite not being marketed as a 16 GB laptop.

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip -1 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

My phone has more RAM than that. I can't imagine running a computer with that little memory considering how poorly optimized software tends to be at this point.

I'm not sure what the overhead for Mac OS is, but that has to be basically rock bottom to be even considered functional unless you're running one of the lighter Linux builds.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I got a free, going to be recycled, dell with 8gb of ram from work. I threw in an nvme and installed Linux. It's not the lightest Linux install, but it is Arch, so definitely on the lighter side. I idle at under 1gb and under normal use don't break 2. I do some coding which uses more but nothing super crazy. MacOS probably uses a little more ram, but it's not Windows. I'd wager than the vast majority of people don't come close to using all of that RAM, and power users are going to get hardware for the task, and this isn't it.

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Under 1GB on a modern build is pretty light. I run CachyOS and I'm pretty sure I idle at significantly more than that. Though I honestly haven't checked, and don't really want to close everything out to find out haha. I do know I'm currently using more than 8GB and not doing anything super heavy, but I do have multiple programs running. And multitasking is always going to be a killer for a system with low RAM limits. There is a reason my laptop has 32 and my desktop has 64.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

I did just check and I was wrong. I idle at 1.6GB. I may have been thinking of a single app I had open when I looked the other day. I did just open Firefox and it took about a gig. Opening about 20 tabs and navigating to different sites did Bum it up to about 5gb. So yea, 8 is on the lower end, but it's usable and I'd bet most people would be fine. Throw in things like swap and high speed storage, I feel most people wouldn't notice. Definitely not enough for high usage though.

I miss when 4gb was good enough.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 2 points 12 hours ago

I run CachyOS with Gnome and it idles at just under 2GB

[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

What the fuck are you doing on a phone that you need 8 GIGABYTES of RAM? Damn son!

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 1 points 4 hours ago

It's great for multitasking. I've seen phones boot and already consume 3-4GB of RAM. Alas, that's how much some of this software uses now, depending on your needs.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 21 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

I mean, at its heart, Mac OS is a heavily re-tooled fork of the BSD platform, so it's not inconceivable that it's light enough to run on 8G. I doubt it would run well on 8G, but it could do it.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

MacOS' kernel is derived from Mach, though with with some BSD code, and is Apple's own work since then. Its API is compatible with FreeBSD, but it's not FreeBSD. And the FreeBSD userland tools don't have effect on systemwide memory management.

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 37 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

My M1 MacBook Air idles at 1.03GB, my XPS 13 running Gnome on Vanilla OS idles at 2.4GB

[–] thatonecoder@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

GNOME on immutable distros = very bloated. Try antiX instead, as it uses a lighter DE.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Even a bloated GNOME runs with much less ram than Windows

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago

I’d be curious to see what Gnome looks like on Debian stable or the like

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

I’m not looking for anything lighter

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago

It runs fine, unless you load up on chrome tabs, or try to run pro apps. Itdoes basic photo editing and admin apps and phone holiday video editing just fine for average users. I have a lot of clients with 8GB M1 machines.

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 4 points 17 hours ago

I know it was lighter than windows the last time I used Mac, but that has been quite a few years now. Hopefully it is a decent machine. Computing just keeps getting more expensive, so having more budget options is definitely good as long as they are reasonably functional.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I have a 2013 MBP that shipped with 8GB, the minimum amount they came with.

Of course it also is upgradable. Which I did, to 16GB. A decade ago.

[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago

My 2013 MBP is still at 8GB. With memory compression, I rarely run into issues unless I'm doing VMs/Docker or something really heavy.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Just to play devil’s advocate: a smartphone is definitely a computer and has no trouble competing with older laptop CPUs in benchmarks. I see this as a difference without a distinction beyond form factor.

8GB is 💯 barely serviceable. I see this is a product for a casual user only, with excellent build quality. I don’t think it ages well when pushed.

[–] pseudonaut@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I mean… of course it’s for the causal users what kind of observation is that?

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 1 points 4 hours ago

What appears to be common sense to you is hardly common sense to the consumer. I choose to be more inclusive thinking of a person who might not necessarily know what 8 GB means. That's a ton of Apple's customers.