this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
361 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

82549 readers
3790 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The article clearly mentions California, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Washington and Wyoming. Perhaps others that I missed as well. Your comment I replied to was not specific to a location, you said "it makes sense to me that consumers can’t be pumping energy into the grid with no way to cut it off" and I was letting you know that it shouldn't be a concern because that isn't how solar power systems work. Do you think that Utah will work different for some reason?

[–] artyom@piefed.social -2 points 4 hours ago

The article clearly mentions California, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Washington and Wyoming.

Those are potential future locations, not current ones. Any discussion around them would be purely hypothetical. I am discussing reality.

that isn't how solar power systems work.

Solar systems can work in any number of ways. That's why we have regulation, to ensure they do work in specific ways. Utah currently has no such regulation. It's "plug and play". People literally just buy them, hang them up, and plug them in.