this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
491 points (98.0% liked)

Australia

4985 readers
45 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (17 children)

I'm failing to see how the phrase "from the river to the sea", alone, can be considered a call to destroy Israel, let alone unequivocally genocidal. It seems like there's a lot of top-down reasoning required to arrive at that conclusion. I don't think there is genocidal intent on the deployment of those words on that woman's top. I think you assume too much. Israeli leaders, on the other hand, use unmistakably genocidal language. And then they also commit genocide. You don't get to both sides this issue with a very tenuous argument that this popular slogan is a call to genocide.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

This is like saying “I don’t see how the phrase “white power” alone can be considered a call to kill black people?” 🤣

It is a call to destroy/eliminate Israel. Don’t try to pretend it’s not.

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

No, it isn't like that. Because "white power" is used exclusively by extremists, whereby "from the river to the sea" is not. Do you see the difference there?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

whereby “from the river to the sea” is not.

It is though. They might not think they're extremists, but they are.

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People who are demanding an end to apartheid are extremists, you say. So apartheid, genocide, ethnonationalism, mowing the lawn, etc etc, are the norm, then? You're raving mad.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People demanding Israel be eliminated, which is what the saying means, are extremists, correct.

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago

I'm not sure if you're aware of how language works, but I am. And I can assure you, your statement is not true, particularly the part you have italicised. This is not as simple as you think it is or would like it to be.
I hope one day you realise how mistaken you are.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)