this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
847 points (93.5% liked)

Selfhosted

60253 readers
493 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Or by mirroring his content to other video sharing platforms like LBRY/Odysee or Peertube. It requires little effort, seems to be risk free, and lays the foundation to migrate from YouTube at some point in the future.

I'm a little puzzled why a lot of creators don't do this, especially ones who criticize YouTube so much and promote self hosting.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

Odysee is a bit of a nazi platform and I think most people want to host their own peertube instance but putting your videos on someone else's instance results in them going down when the instance does

Tho since Pewds is getting more and more interested in tech, I think hosting a Peertube instance would actually be fitting for him.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I'm a little puzzled why a lot of creators don't do this

my guess is that when you become "YouTube famous" you get perks and increased volume pay. this comes with a new contract that has binding resolutions, blocking you from uploading your content to other platforms.