Technology

82798 readers

3605 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

683

Sam Altman Thanks Programmers for Their Effort, Says Their Time Is Over (futurism.com)

submitted 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

228 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Altman’s remarks in his tweet drew an overwhelmingly negative reaction.

“You’re welcome,” one user responded. “Nice to know that our reward is our jobs being taken away.”

Others called him a “f***ing psychopath” and “scum.”

“Nothing says ‘you’re being replaced’ quite like a heartfelt thank you from the guy doing the replacing,” one user wrote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I wish more people brought this up instead of just flinging shit at users/companies using AI.

They're fighting an unwinable battle, AI is here to stay and it will keep improving, we have to adapt and ensure people are able to have their basic needs met.

But that's scary socialism or w/e.

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

AI is absolutely not here to stay. This kind of nonsense needs to be nipped in the bud. The capital investment for ai simply can't be recouped without major fantastical leaps in business.

The revenue coming in is a shell game. The investment numbers simply can't be recouped without being more expensive than actual people.

So yeah. It absolutely can go away.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works -5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Lmfao and computers are just for nerds

Edit: OpenAI, Anthropic, etc can all die, but LLMs are not. You can run a local model.

Now I completely agree with the hype train is completely out of control and its a monetary bubble, but the tool itself is not going away.

Edit2: I think the dotcom bubble is a good analogy, the underlying idea of the internet and all it can do and online ordering and such was solid, just an insane amount of hype on top that simply couldn't be reached at that time. But now, the biggest companies ever are mainly internet/tech companies.

[–] MartianRecon@lemmus.org 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Computers are input-output devices. You put things into a computer and it does what you tell it to do.

LMM's do not do this they just give you a facsimile of what it believes you want.

LMM's will not go away but their functionality is extremely limited, as has been proven by it's failure to 'change business forever.'

And no, 'but the tech isn't there' isn't an argument right now. This is economics. The investment for it's current capabilities are far outsized, and there will be a massive contraction.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago

We are so far beyond "computer is just input output device" realistically. There's thousands of layers of things built on top that produce what we know as a computer and anywhere along that chain things can be broken/not perform as expected because any other layer on the chain failed to do what it was supposed to.

Realistically, what's the difference between a thing and the facsimile of a thing when the result is the same?