this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
692 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

83027 readers
3539 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

there is not much wifi access points that are not routers at the same time and i doubt that said regulation would make such a minor a distinction.

also keep in mind that the news articles are specifically talking about tp-link products.

unfortunately we can only guess, because only official document i have found is as vague as the news reports.

https://www.fcc.gov/supplychain/coveredlist

Routers^ produced in a foreign country, except routers which have been granted a Conditional Approval by DoW or DHS.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

There are many access points that are not routers.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Access points and routers are usually separate once you get away from the consumer grade stuff. The people that run OPNsense at home often use MikroTik or Ubiquiti access points.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

i don't think there is single mikrotik that can't function as a router. the fact you can configure them as software bridge does not change that.

the rest answered here:

there are some but they are definitely in the minority. also this regulation is focused on home and soho devices, it specifically mentiones tp-link, which is really not enterprise brand.

also the regulation from what i found is so vague, that i suspect that for the author router equals to “that white box with antenna sitting on my table” and is very likely they have no clue about difference between l2 and l3 layer and what router actually is.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

There are. Just need to shop in the business side of the store and not consumer. At worst pro-sumer.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

there are some but they are definitely in the minority. also this regulation is focused on home and soho devices, it specifically mentiones tp-link, which is really not enterprise brand.

also the regulation from what i found is so vague, that i suspect that for the author router equals to "that white box with antenna sitting on my table" and is very likely they have no clue about difference between l2 and l3 layer and what router actually is.

[–] pishadoot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

You're being pretty stubborn about your positions but you're misinformed/ignorant.

There are SO many Wi-Fi access points that aren't routers, but a combo router is what most home users buy or get from their ISP. So that's what you think is "most" when in reality the consumer market is dwarfed by commercial.

TP-Link has Omada which is not as enterprise as CISCO but it definitely supports small and medium sized businesses, which are at the greatest risk to vulnerabilities due to low IT department skills.