this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
709 points (99.0% liked)

Selfhosted

59999 readers
799 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] webkitten@piefed.social 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Pretty flawless update from the apt repo on my end.

Server version 10.11.7  
[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think what went wrong and now everything is installed through Docker.

Docker feels like a huge security problem to me.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why?

Docker makes everything so much easier

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I know, but your security then depends on the package maintainer to keep the image up to date

[–] phobiac@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Am officially maintained Docker image is no less a security concern than an officially maintained apt repo. Depending on how you set up a container stack it can even be more secure. An attacker gaining root access to a container that you've given extremely selective access to the host machine is far better than them gaining root access to your actual system.