this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
37 points (89.4% liked)

Selfhosted

56957 readers
978 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey everyone,

I'm a web developer, mostly JS and PHP, about 4 years of experience. A while ago I helped a friend set up the infrastructure for his small IT company and ended up managing the backups there too.

The issue was simple: two servers, and I wanted to manage backups from one place. Backrest was the closest thing I found but it's single-machine, so you get one interface per server. The commercial alternatives felt like overkill. Also, they use Zitadel for SSO on all their internal tools, so OIDC support was a requirement from the start. And since they're working toward ISO 27001, having centralized, auditable backup management wasn't just nice to have.

I didn't find anything that fit, so I built Arkeep.

It's a backup manager with a server/agent model, built on Restic and Rclone. You run one server, deploy agents on the machines you want to back up, and manage everything from a single web UI. Agents connect to the server over gRPC so no ports need to be open on the agent side. It handles Docker volume discovery, pre/post hooks, and streams metrics back in real time.

One thing I want to be upfront about: Go was completely new to me. I had a client that required Go for some backend work, so I used Arkeep as a way to learn the language while building something I actually needed. I used AI a lot to get through it faster. The architecture and the decisions behind it are mine, but I didn't write idiomatic Go from scratch. I know this community has strong opinions on AI-assisted projects right now, so I'd rather say it clearly.

It's been running as a secondary backup system for about a month without issues. Still beta, still rough in places.

What works:

  • Server + agent architecture, agents connect out (no open ports needed)
  • Restic under the hood, Rclone for destinations Restic doesn't support natively
  • Docker volume auto-discovery
  • OIDC support
  • PWA web UI
  • Helm chart (needs more real-world testing)
  • SQLite by default, PostgreSQL available

What's missing or not great yet:

  • No VM support yet, it's planned
  • Dashboard is minimal
  • It's beta, bugs are expected

Repo: https://github.com/arkeep-io/arkeep

If you try it, feedback is very welcome. That's really why I'm posting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago

Quick question, the way you say server/agent architecture, does this mean that the server manages the backup schedule and pulls the backups from the systems or does the connected computer initiate the backups?

I'm currently using synology active backup for my server and used to also use it for my desktop. Linux support is not ideal though and I would like to move to something with similar capabilities that is also not vendor locked.

My personal usecase would be backing up a single server, a desktop and a laptop.